4.5 Article

Utilization of micelles formed from poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) block copolymers as nanocarriers to enable hydrophobic red two-photon absorbing emitters for cells imaging

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 93A, 期 3, 页码 1068-1079

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32607

关键词

block copolymers; molecular imaging; cytotoxicity; nanoparticles; two-photon absorbing materials

资金

  1. NIH (Microscale Life Sciences Center (MLSC)-A Center of Excellence in Genome Sciences)
  2. Boeing-Johnson Foundation
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [P50HG002360] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hydrophobic two-photon absorbing (2PA) red emitter (R) was successfully incorporated into micelles formed from two block copolymers, poly(epsilon-caprolactone)block-poly(ethylene glycol)s, for imaging and toxicity studies. In micelles, the chromophore R exhibits a 2PA cross-section of 400 GM (1 GM = 1 x 10(-50) cm(4) s photon(-1) molecule(-1)) at 820 nm, which is among the highest values reported for red 2PA emitters. The micelles with a cationic amino moiety-containing poly(ethylene glycol) corona showed an enhancement of cell internalization and delivered the dye into the cytoplasmic regions of the mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. In comparison, the dye in micelles with neutral poly(ethylene glycol) as corona could not be delivered into the cells. Cytotoxicity of the micelle-R constructs was studied using a 3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. More than 90% of the cells were viable after they were stained with the dye-containing micelles at different concentrations (dye concentrations of 2-6 mu M and polymer concentrations of 0.05-0.15 mg/mL) for 16 h. This is the first reported application of a hydrophobic 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole-containing 2PA red emitter delivered into the cytoplasm of cells for bioimaging and toxicity assessment. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 93A: 1068-1079, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据