4.7 Article

Cross-talk Between Nitrate-Nitrite-NO and NO Synthase Pathways in Control of Vascular NO Homeostasis

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 295-306

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2013.5481

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [K2012-99X-21971-01-3]
  2. Vinnova (CIDaT)
  3. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation [20110589]
  4. Jeanssons Foundation [JS2011-0212]
  5. Torsten Soderbergs Foundation
  6. EUs 7th Framework program (Flaviola)
  7. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  8. Swedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Inorganic nitrate and nitrite from endogenous and dietary sources have emerged as alternative substrates for nitric oxide (NO) formation in addition to the classic L-arginine NO synthase (NOS)-dependent pathway. Here, we investigated a potential cross-talk between these two pathways in the regulation of vascular function. Results: Long-term dietary supplementation with sodium nitrate (0.1 and 1mmol kg(-1) day(-1)) in rats caused a reversible dose-dependent reduction in phosphorylated endothelial NOS (eNOS) (Ser1177) in aorta and a concomitant increase in phosphorylation at Thr495. Moreover, eNOS-dependent vascular responses were attenuated in vessels harvested from nitrate-treated mice or when nitrite was acutely added to control vessels. The citrulline-to-arginine ratio in plasma, as a measure of eNOS activity, was reduced in nitrate-treated rodents. Telemetry measurements revealed that a low dietary nitrate dose reduced blood pressure, whereas a higher dose was associated with a paradoxical elevation. Finally, plasma cyclic guanosine monophosphate increased in mice that were treated with a low dietary nitrate dose and decreased with a higher dose. Innovation and Conclusions: These results demonstrate the existence of a cross-talk between the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway and the NOS-dependent pathway in control of vascular NO homeostasis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 23, 295-306.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据