4.5 Article

Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-polyethylenimine copolymers as carriers for gene delivery:: Effects of PEG molecular weight and PEGylation degree

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31343

关键词

polyethylenimme; polyethylene glycol; isoporon diisocyanate; nonviral gene delivery; transfection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ideal gene carrier is required both in safety and efficiency for transfection. Polyethylenimine (PEI), a well-studied cationic polymer, has been proved with high transfection efficiency, but is reported as toxicity in many cell lines. In this study, PEI was coupled with polyethylene glycol (PEG) to reduce its cytotoxicity. PEG-PEI copolymers were synthesized with isoporon diisocyanate (IPDI) in two steps. A set of PEG-PEI with different PEG molecular weights (MWs) and amounts of PEG were synthesized. The molecular structure of the resulting copolymers was evaluated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1 NMR), infrared spectroscopy (IR), and gel permeation chromatography (GPC), all of which had successfully verified formation of the copolymers. The particle size and zeta potential of polymer/DNA complexes were measured, and their cytotoxicity and transfection efficiency in Hela cells were evaluated. We found that the copolymer block structure significantly influenced not only the physicochernical properties of complexes, but also their cytotoxicity and transfection efficiency. PEG (5 kDa) significantly reduced the diameter of the spherical complexes. The zeta potential of complexes was reduced with increasing amount of PEG grafting. Cytotoxicity was dependent not on PEG MW but on the amount of PEG grafting. Copolymer PEG-PEI (2-25-1) with 1.89 PEG (2 kDa) was proved to be more efficient for in vitro gene transfer. In conclusion, PEG MW and the degree of PEGylation were found to significantly influence the biological activity of PEG-PEI/DNA complexes. These results provide new sights into the studies using block copolymer as gene delivery systems. (C) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据