4.6 Review

Health literacy screening instruments for eHealth applications: A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 598-607

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.04.001

关键词

Health literacy; Systematic review

资金

  1. National Institute for Nursing Research [T32NR007969, P30 NR010677]
  2. [T15 LM 007079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To systematically review current health literacy (HL) instruments for use in consumer-facing and mobile health information technology screening and evaluation tools. Design: The databases, PubMed, OVID, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index, were searched for health literacy assessment instruments using the terms health, literacy, computer-based, and psychometrics. All instruments identified by this method were critically appraised according to their reported psychometric properties and clinical feasibility. Results: Eleven different health literacy instruments were found. Screening questions, such as asking a patient about his/her need for assistance in navigating health information, were evaluated in seven different studies and are promising for use as a valid, reliable, and feasible computer-based approach to identify patients that struggle with low health literacy. However, there was a lack of consistency in the types of screening questions proposed. There is also a lack of information regarding the psychometric properties of computer-based health literacy instruments. Limitations: Only English language health literacy assessment instruments were reviewed and analyzed. Conclusions: Current health literacy screening tools demonstrate varying benefits depending on the context of their use. In many cases, it seems that a single screening question may be a reliable, valid, and feasible means for establishing health literacy. A combination of screening questions that assess health literacy and technological literacy may enable tailoring eHealth applications to user needs. Further research should determine the best screening question(s) and the best synthesis of various instruments' content and methodologies for computer-based health literacy screening and assessment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据