4.5 Article

Alterations in trabecular bone microarchitecture in the ovine spine and distal femur following ovariectomy

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 47, 期 8, 页码 1918-1921

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.025

关键词

Microarchitecture; Ovariectomy; Osteoporosis; Sheep; Vertebrae; Femur

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [AR052008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis is a bone disease resulting in increased fracture risk as a result of alterations in both quantity and quality of bone. Bone quality is a combination of metabolic and microarchitectural properties of bone that can help to explain the increased susceptibility to fracture. Translational animal models are essential to understanding the pathology and for evaluating potential treatments of this disease. Large animals, such as the ovariectomized sheep, have been used as models for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, long-term studies have not been carried out to observe the effects of ovariectomy after more than one year. This study employed micro-computed tomography to quantify changes in microarchitectural and mechanical parameters in femoral condyles and vertebral bodies of sheep that were sacrificed one or two years following ovariectomy. In the vertebral body, microarchitectural characteristics were significantly degraded following one year of ovariectomy in comparison to controls. The mechanical anisotropy, determined from micro-scale finite element models, was also greater in the ovariectomized groups, although the fabric tensor anisotropy was similar. There was no greater architectural degradation following two years of ovariectomy compared to one. Ovariectomy had minimal effects on the trabecular architecture of the distal femur even after two years. These results indicate that the vertebral body is the preferred anatomic site for studying bone from the ovariectomized sheep model, and that architectural changes stabilize after the first year. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据