4.5 Article

Experimental study of needle-tissue interaction forces: Effect of needle geometries, insertion methods and tissue characteristics

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 47, 期 13, 页码 3344-3353

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.08.007

关键词

Needle insertion; Interaction forces; Needle geometry; Insertion method; Tissue characteristic

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51175373]
  2. New Century Educational Talents Plan of Chinese Education Ministry [NCET-10-0625]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A thorough understanding of needle-tissue interaction mechanics is necessary to optimize needle design, achieve robotically needle steering, and establish surgical simulation system. It is obvious that the interaction is influenced by numerous variable parameters, which are divided into three categories: needle geometries, insertion methods, and tissue characteristics. A series of experiments are performed to explore the effect of influence factors (material samples n=5 for each factor) on the insertion force. Data were collected from different biological tissues and a special tissue-equivalent phantom with similar mechanical properties, using a 1-DOF mechanical testing system instrumented with a 6-DOF force/torque (FIT) sensor. The experimental results indicate that three basic phases (deformation, insertion, and extraction phase) are existent during needle penetration. Needle diameter (0.7-3.2 mm), needle tip (blunt, diamond, conical, and beveled) and bevel angle (10-85 degrees) are turned out to have a great influence on insertion force, so do the insertion velocity (0.5-10 mm/s), drive mode (robot-assisted and hand-held), and the insertion process (interrupted and continuous). Different tissues such as skin, muscle, fat, liver capsule and vessel are proved to generate various force cures, which can contribute to the judgement of the needle position and provide efficient insertion strategy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据