4.5 Article

Phase-dependent changes in local dynamic stability of human gait

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 45, 期 13, 页码 2208-2214

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.022

关键词

Gait; Kinematics; Dynamical stability; Lyapunov exponent; Variability

资金

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  2. Health Authorities of Midt-Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several methods derived from nonlinear time series analysis have been suggested to quantify stability in human gait kinematics. One of these methods is the definition of the maximum finite time Lyapunov exponent (lambda) that quantifies how the system responds to infinitesimal perturbations. However, there are fundamental limitations to the conventional definition of lambda for gait kinematics. First, exponential increase in initial perturbations cannot be assumed since real-life perturbations of gait kinematics are finite sized. Second, the transitions between single and double support phase within each stride cycle define two distinct dynamical regimes that may not be captured by a single lambda. The present article presents a new method to quantify intra-stride changes lambda(t) in local dynamical stability and employs the method to 3D lower extremity gait kinematics in 10 healthy adults walking on a treadmill at 3 different speeds. All participants showed an intra-stride change in lambda(t) in the transition between single and double support phase. The intra-stride change reflected an both a increase and decrease in lambda(t) at heel strike and toe off, respectively, with increased gait speed. Furthermore, a close relationship was found between the intra-stride change in standard deviation of foot velocity in the anterior-posterior direction and the intra-stride change of the initial perturbations. The present results indicate that local dynamical stability has gait phase-dependent changes that are not identified by conventional computation of a single lambda. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据