4.5 Article

Training multi-parameter gaits to reduce the knee adduction moment with data-driven models and haptic feedback

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 1605-1609

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.016

关键词

Gait retraining; Osteoarthritis; Knee adduction moment; Haptic; Real-time feedback

资金

  1. TEKES
  2. Finnish ministry for research
  3. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1017826] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to evaluate gait retraining for reducing the knee adduction moment. Our primary objective was to determine whether subject-specific altered gaits aimed at reducing the knee adduction moment by 30% or more could be identified and adopted in a single session through haptic (touch) feedback training on multiple kinematic gait parameters. Nine healthy subjects performed gait retraining, in which data-driven models specific to each subject were determined through experimental trials and were used to train novel gaits involving a combination of kinematic changes to the tibia angle, foot progression and trunk sway angles. Wearable haptic devices were used on the back, knee and foot for real-time feedback. All subjects were able to adopt altered gaits requiring simultaneous changes to multiple kinematic parameters and reduced their knee adduction moments by 29-48%. Analysis of single parameter gait training showed that moving the knee medially by increasing tibia angle, increasing trunk sway and toeing in all reduced the first peak of the knee adduction moment with tibia angle changes having the most dramatic effect. These results suggest that individualized data-driven gait retraining may be a viable option for reducing the knee adduction moment as a treatment method for early-stage knee osteoarthritis patients with sufficient sensation, endurance and motor learning capabilities. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据