4.5 Article

Determination of mechanical properties of soft tissue scaffolds by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 44, 期 13, 页码 2356-2361

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.010

关键词

AFM; Nanoindentation test; Soft scaffolds; Measurement of mechanical property of scaffolds; 3D cultures

资金

  1. National Science Foundation NSF [CBET 0756455]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [5-2009-381]
  3. ABI [0152-27504-231108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the determination of mechanical properties of a hard scaffold is relatively straightforward, the mechanical testing of a soft tissue scaffold poses significant challenges due in part to its fragility. Here, we report a new approach for characterizing the stiffness and elastic modulus of a soft scaffold through atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation. Using collagen-chitosan hydrogel scaffolds as model soft tissue scaffolds, we demonstrated the feasibility of using AFM nanoindentation to determine a force curve of a soft tissue scaffold. A mathematical model was developed to ascertain the stiffness and elastic modulus of a scaffold from its force curve obtained under different conditions. The elastic modulus of a collagen-chitosan (80%/20%, v/v) scaffold is found to be 3.69 kPa. The scaffold becomes stiffer if it contains more chitosan. The elastic modulus of a scaffold composed of 70% collagen and 30% chitosan is about 11.6 kPa. Furthermore, the stiffness of the scaffold is found to be altered significantly by extracellular matrix deposited from cells that are grown inside the scaffold. The elastic modulus of collagen-chitosan scaffolds increased from 10.5 kPa on day 3 to 63.4 kPa on day 10 when human foreskin fibroblast cells grew inside the scaffolds. Data acquired from these measurements will offer new insights into understanding cell fate regulation induced by physiochemical cues of tissue scaffolds. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据