4.5 Article

Probing cell structure by controlling the mechanical environment with cell-substrate interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 187-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.014

关键词

Cell morphology; Mechanical stimulation; Actin filaments; Vinculin; Polydimethylsiloxane; Fibroblasts

资金

  1. Directorate For Engineering
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0856187] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent results demonstrate the exquisite sensitivity of cell morphology and structure to mechanical Stimulation. Mechanical stimulation is often coupled with cell-substrate interactions that can, in turn, influence molecular response and determine cellular fates including apoptosis, proliferation, and differentiation. To understand these effects as they specifically relate to compressive mechanical stimulation and topographic control, we developed a microfabricated system to grow cells on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) rnicrochannel surfaces where we maintained compression stimulation. We also probed cellular response following compressive mechanical Stimulation to PDMS substrates of varying stiffness. In these instances, we examined cytoskeletal and morphologic changes in living cells attached to Our substrate following the application of localized compressive Stimulation. We found that the overall morphology and cell Structure, including the actin cytoskeleton, oriented in the direction of the compressive strain applied and along the topographic microchannels. Furthermore by comparing topographic response to material stiffness, we found a 40% increase in cell area for cells Cultured on the microchannels versus softer PDMS as well as a decreased cell area of 30% when using softer PDMS over unmodified PDMS. These findings have implications for research in a diversity of fields including cell-material interactions, mechanotransduction, and tissue engineering. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据