4.5 Article

Combined effects of microtopography and cyclic strain on vascular smooth muscle cell orientation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 762-769

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.027

关键词

microtopography; microgrooves; cyclic strain; vascular smooth muscle cell; cell orientation

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL072900-02, R01 HL72900, R01 HL072900, R01 HL072900-03, R01 HL072900-01A1, R01 HL072900-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL072900] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular alignment studies have shown that cell orientation has a large effect on the expression and behavior of cells. Cyclic strain and substrate microtopography have each been shown to regulate cellular alignment. This study examined the combined effects of these two stimuli on the alignment of bovine vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Cells were cultured on substrates with microgrooves of varying widths oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the direction of an applied cyclic tensile strain. We found that microgrooves oriented parallel to the direction of the applied strain limited the orientation response of VSMCs to the mechanical stimulus, while grooves perpendicular to the applied strain enhanced cellular alignment. Further, the extent to which parallel grooves limited cell alignment was found to be dependent on the groove width. It was found that for both a small (15 mu m) and a large (70 mu m) groove width, cells were better able to reorient in response to the applied strain than for an intermediate groove width (40 an). This study indicates that micro topographical cues modulate the orientation response of VSMCs to cyclic strain. The results suggest that there is a range of microgroove dimensions that is most effective at maintaining the orientation of the cells in the presence of an opposing stimulus induced by cyclic strain. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据