4.5 Article

Role of Thermo-responsiveness and Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Cross-link Density on Protein Release from Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Hydrogels

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1163/092050609X12578498952315

关键词

Thermo-responsive hydrogel; poly(N-isopropylacrylamide); poly(ethylene glycol); protein release; drug delivery

资金

  1. The Lincy Foundation
  2. The Macula Foundation
  3. Veteran's Administration
  4. National Science Foundation [0852048]
  5. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0852048] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermo-responsive hydrogels have shown promise as injectable materials for local drug delivery. However, the phase-induced changes in polymer properties of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) can pose additional challenges for achieving controlled protein release. In this work, thermo-responsive hydrogels derived from NIPAAm and cross-linked with poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEG-DA) were synthesized via free radical polymerization. The volume phase transition temperature (VPTT) of the hydrogels ranged from 32.9 degrees C to 35.9 degrees C. Below the VPTT, swelling ratios of the hydrogels decreased with cross-linker concentration, and showed a sharp drop (at least 4-fold) upon phase change. Protein encapsulation efficiency was high (84-90%) and decreased with cross-linker concentration. Release of bovine serum albumin, a model protein, at body temperature was significantly higher than at room temperature (67% at 37 degrees C compared to 44% at 23 degrees C after 48 h). The release kinetics of proteins from the hydrogels were initially expected to be a function of cross-link density. However, at the hydrogel compositions explored in this work, protein release did not change significantly with cross-linker mol fraction. The thermo-responsive hydrogels offer a promising platform for the localized delivery of proteins. (C) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据