4.5 Article

Comparison of Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Behaviors on Poly(caprolactone) with or without Surface Modification: Studies on Cell Adhesion, Survival and Proliferation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION
卷 20, 期 14, 页码 1975-1993

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1163/156856208X396074

关键词

RGD; poly(caprolactone); bone marrow stromal cell; cell adhesion; focal adhesion kinase; surface modification

资金

  1. NIH [R01 DE13608]
  2. Coulter Foundation
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE013608] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(caprolactone) (PCL) is a promising biodegradable polymer for tissue engineering. However, intrinsically poor cell-adhesive properties of PCL may limit its application. In this study, the PCL film surface was modified with RGDC peptide by a chemical immobilization procedure. Furthermore, bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) behaviors including attachment, spreading, focal adhesion formation, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activation, apoptosis and proliferation when cultured on the modified PCL films were investigated. Our results demonstrated that PCL with RGD modification promoted initial BMSC attachment, spreading and focal adhesion formation. At a later time point (12 h), BMSC attachment on both RGD peptide-modified PCL and PCL-NH2 films significantly increased compared to untreated PCL films. Importantly, FAK phosphorylation was significantly increased only on the films with RGD-modified films, not on the PCL-NH2 films, demonstrating that PCL with RGD modification had an advantage in initiating the specific integrin-mediated signal transduction and might play an important role in the subsequent retardation in cell death and enhancement in cell proliferation. The present results provide more evidence that functionalizing PCL with RGD peptides may be a feasible way to improve the interaction between BMSC and PCL substrate, which is important in tissue engineering. (C) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据