4.6 Article

Stu2, the Budding Yeast XMAP215/Dis1 Homolog, Promotes Assembly of Yeast Microtubules by Increasing Growth Rate and Decreasing Catastrophe Frequency

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 289, 期 41, 页码 28087-28093

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.584300

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM110386]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stu2 is the budding yeast member of the XMAP215/Dis1 family of microtubule polymerases. It is essential in cell division, allowing proper spindle orientation and metaphase chromosome alignment, as well as spindle elongation during anaphase. Despite Stu2 having a phenotype that suggests it promotes microtubule growth, like the other members of the XMAP215/Dis1 family, previous studies with purified Stu2 indicate only that it antagonizes microtubule growth. One potential explanation for these contradictory findings is that the assays were performed with mammalian brain tubulin, which may not be the right substrate to test the activity of Stu2 given that yeast and brain tubulins are quite divergent in sequence and that the vertebrate tubulins are subject to many post-translational modifications. To test this possibility, we reconstituted the activity of Stu2 with purified budding yeast tubulin. We found that Stu2 accelerated microtubule growth in yeast tubulin by severalfold, similar to the acceleration reported for XMAP215 in porcine brain tubulin. Furthermore, Stu2 accelerated polymerization in yeast tubulin to a much greater extent than in porcine brain tubulin, and the concentration of Stu2 required to reach 50% maximum activity in yeast tubulin was nearly 2 orders of magnitude lower than that in porcine brain tubulin. We conclude that Stu2 is a microtubule polymerase, like its relatives, and that its activity is considerably higher in yeast tubulin compared with mammalian brain tubulin. The biochemical properties of Stu2 reported here account for many of the phenotypes of Stu2 observed in cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据