4.6 Article

The BET Bromodomain Inhibitor I-BET151 Acts Downstream of Smoothened Protein to Abrogate the Growth of Hedgehog Protein-driven Cancers

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 289, 期 51, 页码 35494-35502

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.595348

关键词

Bromodomain-containing Protein 4 (BRD4); Drug Screening; Epigenetics; Hedgehog Signaling Pathway; Medulloblastoma; Gli; I-BET151

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1CA082628, RO1NS067289]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epigenetic enzymes modulate signal transduction pathways in different biological contexts. We reasoned that epigenetic regulators might modulate the Hedgehog (HH) signaling pathway, a main driver of cell proliferation in various cancers including medulloblastoma. To test this hypothesis, we performed an unbiased small-molecule screen utilizing an HH-dependent reporter cell line (Light2 cells). We incubated Light2 cells with small molecules targeting different epigenetic modulators and identified four histone deacetylase inhibitors and a bromodomain and extra terminal domain (BET) protein inhibitor (I-BET151) that attenuate HH activity. I-BET151 was also able to inhibit the expression of HH target genes in Sufu(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts, in which constitutive Gli activity is activated in a Smoothened (Smo)-independent fashion, consistent with it acting downstream of Smo. Knockdown of Brd4 (which encodes one of the BET proteins) phenocopies I-BET151 treatment, suggesting that Brd4 is a regulator of the HH signaling pathway. Consistent with this suggestion, Brd4 associates with the proximal promoter region of the Gli1 locus, and does so in a manner that can be reversed by I-BET151. Importantly, I-BET151 also suppressed the HH activity-dependent growth of medulloblastoma cells, in vitro and in vivo. These studies suggest that BET protein modulation may be an attractive therapeutic strategy for attenuating the growth of HH-dependent cancers, such as medulloblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据