4.6 Article

Formation of Amyloid Fibers by Monomeric Light Chain Variable Domains

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 289, 期 40, 页码 27513-27525

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.585638

关键词

Amyloid; Antibody; Multiple Myeloma; Protein Aggregation; X-ray Crystallography; Bence-Jones Proteins; Light Chain Amyloidosis; Light Chain Variable Domains; Systemic Amyloidosis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG-029430]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-0958111]
  3. Amyloidosis Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0958111] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0958111] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Amyloid fibers are protein aggregates associated with numerous pathologies. Results: Mcg light chain variable domains form amyloid fibers through monomers. Conclusion: This light chain variable domain monomer is the fundamental unit required to form amyloid fibers. Significance: Understanding the molecular mechanism of Mcg light chain amyloid fiber formation has implications for treating systemic amyloidosis. Systemic light chain amyloidosis is a lethal disease characterized by excess immunoglobulin light chains and light chain fragments composed of variable domains, which aggregate into amyloid fibers. These fibers accumulate and damage organs. Some light chains induce formation of amyloid fibers, whereas others do not, making it unclear what distinguishes amyloid formers from non-formers. One mechanism by which sequence variation may reduce propensity to form amyloid fibers is by shifting the equilibrium toward an amyloid-resistant quaternary structure. Here we identify the monomeric form of the Mcg immunoglobulin light chain variable domain as the quaternary unit required for amyloid fiber assembly. Dimers of Mcg variable domains remain stable and soluble, yet become prone to assemble into amyloid fibers upon disassociation into monomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据