4.6 Article

Protein Interacting with C-kinase 1 (PICK1) Binding Promiscuity Relies on Unconventional PSD-95/Discs-Large/ZO-1 Homology (PDZ) Binding Modes for Nonclass II PDZ Ligands

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 289, 期 36, 页码 25327-25340

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.548743

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 DA 12408]
  2. Danish Medical Research Council
  3. University of Copenhagen BioScaRT Program of Excellence
  4. Lundbeck Foundation Center for Biomembranes in Nanomedicine
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  6. Fabrikant Vilhelm Pedersen og Hustrus Mindelegat
  7. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC0002181] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PDZ domain proteins control multiple cellular functions by governing assembly of protein complexes. It remains unknown why individual PDZ domains can bind the extreme C terminus of very diverse binding partners and maintain selectivity. By employing NMR spectroscopy, together with molecular modeling, mutational analysis, and fluorescent polarization binding experiments, we identify here three structural mechanisms explaining why the PDZ domain of PICK1 selectively binds >30 receptors, transporters, and kinases. Class II ligands, including the dopamine transporter, adopt a canonical binding mode with promiscuity obtained via differential packing in the binding groove. Class I ligands, such as protein kinase C alpha, depend on residues upstream from the canonical binding sequence that are likely to interact with flexible loop residues of the PDZ domain. Finally, we obtain evidence that the unconventional ligand ASIC1a has a dual binding mode involving a canonical insertion and a noncanonical internal insertion with the two C-terminal residues forming interactions outside the groove. Together with an evolutionary analysis, the data show how unconventional binding modes might evolve for a protein recognition domain to expand the repertoire of functionally important interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据