4.6 Article

Transgenic Mouse α- and β-Cardiac Myosins Containing the R403Q Mutation Show Isoform-dependent Transient Kinetic Differences

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 21, 页码 14780-14787

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.450668

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL111847, AR053975, HL38113, HL110869, HL077101, HL049058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC) is a major cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes. The discovery in 1990 that a point mutation at residue 403 (R403Q) in the beta-myosin heavy chain (MHC) caused a severe form of FHC was the first of many demonstrations linking FHC to mutations in muscle proteins. A mouse model for FHC has been widely used to study the mechanochemical properties of mutated cardiac myosin, but mouse hearts express alpha-MHC, whereas the ventricles of larger mammals express predominantly beta-MHC. To address the role of the isoform backbone on function, we generated a transgenic mouse in which the endogenous alpha-MHC was partially replaced with transgenically encoded beta-MHC or alpha-MHC. A His(6) tag was cloned at the N terminus, along with R403Q, to facilitate isolation of myosin subfragment 1 (S1). Stopped flow kinetics were used to measure the equilibrium constants and rates of nucleotide binding and release for the mouse S1 isoforms bound to actin. For the wild-type isoforms, we found that the affinity of MgADP for alpha-S1 (100 mu M) is similar to 4-fold weaker than for beta-S1 (25 mu M). Correspondingly, the MgADP release rate for alpha-S1 (350 s(-1)) is similar to 3-fold greater than for beta-S1 (120 s(-1)). Introducing the R403Q mutation caused only a minor reduction in kinetics for beta-S1, but R403Q in alpha-S1 caused the ADP release rate to increase by 20% (430 s(-1)). These transient kinetic studies on mouse cardiac myosins provide strong evidence that the functional impact of an FHC mutation on myosin depends on the isoform backbone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据