4.6 Article

Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β)-mediated Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF) Expression in Hepatic Stellate Cells Requires Stat3 Signaling Activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 42, 页码 30708-30719

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.478685

关键词

ERK; Jak Kinase; Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK); MAP Kinases (MAPKs); PI 3-kinase (PI3K); SMAD Transcription Factor; Liver Fibrosis

资金

  1. Marie Curie Initial Training Network (ITN) IT-Liver grant
  2. Netherlands Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, Centre for Biomedical Genetics
  3. German Research Foundation [SFB TRR77, Do373/8-1]
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In fibrotic liver, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is constantly expressed in activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and acts downstream of TGF- to modulate extracellular matrix production. Distinct from other cell types in which Smad signaling plays major role in regulating CTGF production, TGF- stimulated CTGF expression in activated HSCs is only in part dependent on Smad3. Other signaling molecules like MAPKs and PI3Ks may also participate in this process, and the underlying mechanisms have yet to be clarified. In this study, we report involvement of Stat3 activation in modulating CTGF production upon TGF- challenge in activated HSCs. Stat3 is phosphorylated via JAK1 and acts as a critical ALK5 (activin receptor-like kinase 5) downstream signaling molecule to mediate CTGF expression. This process requires de novo gene transcription and is additionally modulated by MEK1/2, JNK, and PI3K pathways. Cell-specific knockdown of Smad3 partially decreases CTGF production, whereas it has no significant influence on Stat3 activation. The total CTGF production induced by TGF- in activated HSCs is therefore, to a large extent, dependent on the balance and integration of the canonical Smad3 and Stat3 signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据