4.6 Article

Regulation of Phospholipase D Activity and Phosphatidic Acid Production after Purinergic (P2Y6) Receptor Stimulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 28, 页码 20477-20487

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.451708

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Grants/Molecular Libraries Probe Production Centers Network [U54 MH084659, P01-ES013125, U54 069338, T32 MH093366]
  2. McDonnell Foundation for Brain Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphatidic acid (PA) is a lipid second messenger located at the intersection of several lipid metabolism and cell signaling events including membrane trafficking, survival, and proliferation. Generation of signaling PA has long been primarily attributed to the activation of phospholipase D (PLD). PLD catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine into PA. A variety of both receptor-tyrosine kinase and G-protein-coupled receptor stimulations have been shown to lead to PLD activation and PA generation. This study focuses on profiling the PA pool upon P2Y(6) receptor signaling manipulation to determine the major PA producing enzymes. Here we show that PLD, although highly active, is not responsible for the majority of stable PA being produced upon UDP stimulation of the P2Y(6) receptor and that PA levels are tightly regulated. By following PA flux in the cell we show that PLD is involved in an initial increase in PA upon receptor stimulation; however, when PLD is blocked, the cell compensates by increasing PA production from other sources. We further delineate the P2Y(6) signaling pathway showing that phospholipase C beta 3 (PLC beta 3), PLC delta 1, DGK zeta and PLD are all downstream of receptor activation. We also show that DGK zeta is a novel negative regulator of PLD activity in this system that occurs through an inhibitory mechanism with PKC alpha. These results further define the downstream events resulting in PA production in the P2Y(6) receptor signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据