4.6 Article

C-type Lectin Binds to β-Integrin to Promote Hemocytic Phagocytosis in an Invertebrate

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 289, 期 4, 页码 2405-2414

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.528885

关键词

Integrin; Invertebrates; Phagocytosis; Protein-Protein Interactions; RNA Interference (RNAi); C-type Lectin; Opsonin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31130056, 31302217]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB114405]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20110131130003]
  4. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Shandong, China [ZR2011CM014]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M540553]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phagocytosis is a conserved cellular response among metazoans. Opsonins are some molecules that label targets to increase their susceptibility to phagocytosis. Opsonins are usually captured by receptors on the surface of phagocytes. Our previous study found the C-type lectin FcLec4 from Chinese white shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis might function as an opsonin to facilitate bacterial clearance. In the present study we purified the native FcLec4 protein and confirmed its opsonic activity in the near relation, kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus. The possible receptor of FcLec4 was identified as -integrin by panning a T7 phage display library of shrimp hemocytes and then confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation assay. We further proved that the interaction between FcLec4 and -integrin did not rely on the carbohydrate recognition domain but on the N terminus of FcLec4. In addition, inhibition of FcLec4 expression using RNAi delayed bacterial clearance, and -integrin knockdown suppressed the opsonic activity of FcLec4. This study is the first to show the direct interaction between an opsonin and its receptor in crustaceans. Our study provides new insights into invertebrate phagocytosis and the functions of C-type lectins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据