4.6 Article

Nonclassical Activation of Hedgehog Signaling Enhances Multidrug Resistance and Makes Cancer Cells Refractory to Smoothened-targeting Hedgehog Inhibition

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 17, 页码 11824-11833

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.432302

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health from NCI [R01CA138850, R01CA140472]
  2. Mayer Mitchell award
  3. University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Metabolic Bone Disease pilot grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is critical in normal development. However, it has been reported to be up-regulated in numerous cancers and implicated in tumorigenicity and metastasis. Classical activation of Hh signaling initiated by Hh ligands results in activation of Smoothened (SMOH) and culminates in the activation of the GLI transcription factors. Classical Hh signaling is autocrine or paracrine (involving interaction between tumor cells and their stroma/microenvironment). The tumor milieu is rich in inflammatory cytokines that can modulate tumor cell behavior. Here, we show for the first time that the Hh pathway can be nonclassically up-regulated by the inflammatory cytokine, osteopontin (OPN). OPN-initiated Akt-GSK3 beta signaling mediates the subcellular distribution and activation of GLI1 resulting in the modulation of epithelial mesenchymal plasticity and drug resistance. Interestingly, the SMOH inhibitor cyclopamine was unable to uncouple the effects of OPN on Hh signaling, indicating that OPN nonclassically activates GLI-mediated transcription. Given the fact that OPN is itself transcriptionally activated upon Hh signaling, our current findings highlight the possibility of a feedforward vicious cycle such that the Hh pathway might be turned on nonclassically by stimuli from the tumor milieu. Thus, drugs that target the classical Hh ligand-mediated activation of Hh signaling may be compromised in their ability to interfere with the functioning of the pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据