4.6 Article

Isolation and Characterization of Two Geometric Allene Oxide Isomers Synthesized from 9S-Hydroperoxylinoleic Acid by Cytochrome P450 CYP74C3 STEREOCHEMICAL ASSIGNMENT OF NATURAL FATTY ACID ALLENE OXIDES

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 29, 页码 20797-20806

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.482521

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Grant [GM-074888]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) grant [CHE-1212879]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specialized cytochromes P450 or catalase-related hemoproteins transform fatty acid hydroperoxides to allene oxides, highly reactive epoxides leading to cyclopentenones and other products. The stereochemistry of the natural allene oxides is incompletely defined, as are the structural features required for their cyclization. We investigated the transformation of 9S-hydroperoxylinoleic acid with the allene oxide synthase CYP74C3, a reported reaction that unexpectedly produces an allene oxide-derived cyclopentenone. Using biphasic reaction conditions at 0 degrees C, we isolated the initial products and separated two allene oxide isomers by HPLC at -15 degrees C. One matched previously described allene oxides in its UV spectrum (lambda(max) 236 nm) and NMR spectrum (defining a 9,10-epoxy-octadec-10,12Z-dienoate). The second was a novel stereoisomer (UV lambda(max) 239 nm) with distinctive NMR chemical shifts. Comparison of NOE interactions of the epoxy proton at C9 in the two allene oxides (and the equivalent NOE experiment in 12,13-epoxy allene oxides) allowed assignment at the isomeric C10 epoxy-ene carbon as Z in the new isomer and the E configuration in all previously characterized allene oxides. The novel 10Z isomer spontaneously formed a cis-cyclopentenone at room temperature in hexane. These results explain the origin of the cyclopentenone, provide insights into the mechanisms of allene oxide cyclization, and define the double bond geometry in naturally occurring allene oxides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据