4.6 Article

Regulation of Glucagon Secretion in Normal and Diabetic Human Islets by γ-Hydroxybutyrate and Glycine

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 6, 页码 3938-3951

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.385682

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01DK089529, DK53012, DK22122, DK53761, HD26979, U42-RR-016600, U01 DK070430]
  2. NIDDK/Beckman Research Center (City of Hope) Integrated Islet Distribution Program [10028044]
  3. American Diabetes Association [7-11-BS-34]
  4. [DK19525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paracrine signaling between pancreatic islet beta-cells and alpha-cells has been proposed to play a role in regulating glucagon responses to elevated glucose and hypoglycemia. To examine this possibility in human islets, we used a metabolomic approach to trace the responses of amino acids and other potential neurotransmitters to stimulation with [U-C-13] glucose in both normal individuals and type 2 diabetics. Islets from type 2 diabetics uniformly showed decreased glucose stimulation of insulin secretion and respiratory rate but demonstrated two different patterns of glucagon responses to glucose: one group responded normally to suppression of glucagon by glucose, but the second group was non-responsive. The non-responsive group showed evidence of suppressed islet GABA levels and of GABA shunt activity. In further studies with normal human islets, we found that gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a potent inhibitory neurotransmitter, is generated in beta-cells by an extension of the GABA shunt during glucose stimulation and interacts with alpha-cell GHB receptors, thus mediating the suppressive effect of glucose on glucagon release. We also identified glycine, acting via alpha-cell glycine receptors, as the predominant amino acid stimulator of glucagon release. The results suggest that glycine and GHB provide a counterbalancing receptor-based mechanism for controlling alpha-cell secretory responses to metabolic fuels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据