4.6 Article

Multidomain Carbohydrate-binding Proteins Involved in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Starch Metabolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 287, 期 41, 页码 34614-34625

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.397380

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K01DK084214]
  2. University of Michigan [GM07544]
  3. University of Michigan Gastrointestinal Peptides Research Center
  4. United States Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences for use of the Advanced Photon Source [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. Michigan Economic Development Corporation
  6. Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor program [085P1000817]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human colonic bacteria are necessary for the digestion of many dietary polysaccharides. The intestinal symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron uses five outer membrane proteins to bind and degrade starch. Here, we report the x-ray crystallographic structures of SusE and SusF, two outer membrane proteins composed of tandem starch specific carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) with no enzymatic activity. Examination of the two CBMs in SusE and three CBMs in SusF reveals subtle differences in the way each binds starch and is reflected in their K-d values for both high molecular weight starch and small maltooligosaccharides. Thus, each site seems to have a unique starch preference that may enable these proteins to interact with different regions of starch or its breakdown products. Proteins similar to SusE and SusF are encoded in many other polysaccharide utilization loci that are possessed by human gut bacteria in the phylum Bacteroidetes. Thus, these proteins are likely to play an important role in carbohydrate metabolism in these abundant symbiotic species. Understanding structural changes that diversify and adapt related proteins in the human gut microbial community will be critical to understanding the detailed mechanistic roles that they perform in the complex digestive ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据