4.6 Article

Enforced Presentation of an Extrahelical Guanine to the Lesion Recognition Pocket of Human 8-Oxoguanine Glycosylase, hOGG1

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 287, 期 30, 页码 24916-24928

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.316497

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM044853, CA100742, GM030804]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. National Cancer Center
  4. Harvard College Program for Research in Science and Engineering
  5. Herchel Smith Harvard Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship
  6. Harvard College Research Program
  7. Ruth Kirschstein National Research Service Award Fellowship [F32 GM077935-01]
  8. United States Dept. of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A poorly understood aspect of DNA repair proteins is their ability to identify exceedingly rare sites of damage embedded in a large excess of nearly identical undamaged DNA, while catalyzing repair only at the damaged sites. Progress toward understanding this problem has been made by comparing the structures and biochemical behavior of these enzymes when they are presented with either a target lesion or a corresponding undamaged nucleobase. Trapping and analyzing such DNA-protein complexes is particularly difficult in the case of base extrusion DNA repair proteins because of the complexity of the repair reaction, which involves extrusion of the target base from DNA followed by its insertion into the active site where glycosidic bond cleavage is catalyzed. Here we report the structure of a human 8-oxoguanine (oxoG) DNA glycosylase, hOGG1, in which a normal guanine from DNA has been forcibly inserted into the enzyme active site. Although the interactions of the nucleobase with the active site are only subtly different for G versus oxoG, hOGG1 fails to catalyze excision of the normal nucleobase. This study demonstrates that even if hOGG1 mistakenly inserts a normal base into its active site, the enzyme can still reject it on the basis of catalytic incompatibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据