4.6 Article

Modulation of Starch Digestion for Slow Glucose Release through Toggling of Activities of Mucosal α-Glucosidases

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 287, 期 38, 页码 31929-31938

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.351858

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [111237]
  2. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario [NA-6305]
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Canadian Digestive Health Foundation studentship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Starch digestion involves the breakdown by alpha-amylase to small linear and branched malto-oligosaccharides, which are in turn hydrolyzed to glucose by the mucosal alpha-glucosidases, maltase-glucoamylase (MGAM) and sucrase-isomaltase (SI). MGAM and SI are anchored to the small intestinal brush-border epithelial cells, and each contains a catalytic N- and C-terminal subunit. All four subunits have alpha-1,4-exohydrolytic glucosidase activity, and the SI N-terminal subunit has an additional exo-debranching activity on the alpha-1,6-linkage. Inhibition of alpha-amylase and/or alpha-glucosidases is a strategy for treatment of type 2 diabetes. We illustrate here the concept of toggling: differential inhibition of subunits to examine more refined control of glucogenesis of the alpha-amylolyzed starch malto-oligosaccharides with the aim of slow glucose delivery. Recombinant MGAM and SI subunits were individually assayed with alpha-amylolyzed waxy corn starch, consisting mainly of maltose, maltotriose, and branched alpha-limit dextrins, as substrate in the presence of four different inhibitors: acarbose and three sulfonium ion compounds. The IC50 values show that the four alpha-glucosidase subunits could be differentially inhibited. The results support the prospect of controlling starch digestion rates to induce slow glucose release through the toggling of activities of the mucosal alpha-glucosidases by selective enzyme inhibition. This approach could also be used to probe associated metabolic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据