4.6 Article

Subcomplexes of Ancestral Respiratory Complex I Subunits Rapidly Turn Over in Vivo as Productive Assembly Intermediates in Arabidopsis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 8, 页码 5707-5717

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.432070

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology Grant [CE0561495]
  2. Scholarship International Research Fees, a University International Stipend (UIS)
  3. Top Up Scholarship
  4. ARC [FT110100242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subcomplexes of mitochondrial respiratory complex I (CI; EC 1.6.5.3) are shown to turn over in vivo, and we propose a role in an ancestral assembly pathway. By progressively labeling Arabidopsis cell cultures with N-15 and isolating mitochondria, we have identified CI subcomplexes through differences in N-15 incorporation into their protein subunits. The 200-kDa subcomplex, containing the ancestral gamma-carbonic anhydrase (gamma-CA), gamma-carbonic anhydrase-like, and 20.9-kDa subunits, had a significantly higher turnover rate than intact CI or CI + CIII2. In vitro import of precursors for these CI subunits demonstrated rapid generation of subcomplexes and revealed that their specific abundance varied when different ancestral subunits were imported. Time course studies of precursor import showed the further assembly of these subcomplexes into CI and CI + CIII2, indicating that the subcomplexes are productive intermediates of assembly. The strong transient incorporation of new subunits into the 200-kDa subcomplex in a gamma-CA mutant is consistent with this subcomplex being a key initiator of CI assembly in plants. This evidence alongside the pattern of coincident occurrence of genes encoding these particular proteins broadly in eukaryotes, except for opisthokonts, provides a framework for the evolutionary conservation of these accessory subunits and evidence of their function in ancestral CI assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据