4.6 Article

Single-stranded DNA Scanning and Deamination by APOBEC3G Cytidine Deaminase at Single Molecule Resolution

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 287, 期 19, 页码 15826-15835

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.342790

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM085116, ES13192, GM2142]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-0747285]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0747285] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

APOBEC3G (Apo3G) is a single-stranded (ss) DNA cytosine deaminase that eliminates HIV-1 infectivity by converting C -> U in numerous small target motifs on the minus viral cDNA. Apo3G deaminates linear ssDNA in vitro with pronounced spatial asymmetry favoring the 3' -> 5' direction. A similar polarity observed in vivo is believed responsible for initiating localized C -> T mutational gradients that inactivate the virus. When compared with double-stranded (ds) DNA scanning enzymes, e.g. DNA glycosylases that excise rare aberrant bases, there is a paucity of mechanistic studies on ssDNA scanning enzymes. Here, we investigate ssDNA scanning and motif-targeting mechanisms for Apo3G using single molecule Forster resonance energy transfer. We address the specific issue of deamination asymmetry within the general context of ssDNA scanning mechanisms and show that Apo3G scanning trajectories, ssDNA contraction, and deamination efficiencies depend on motif sequence, location, and ionic strength. Notably, we observe the presence of bidirectional quasi-localized scanning of Apo3G occurring proximal to a 5' hot motif, a motif-dependent DNA contraction greatest for 5' hot > 3' hot > 5' cold motifs, and diminished mobility at low salt. We discuss the single molecule Forster resonance energy transfer data in terms of a model in which deamination polarity occurs as a consequence of Apo3G binding to ssDNA in two orientations, one that is catalytically favorable, with the other disfavorable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据