4.6 Article

Ablation of Calcineurin Aβ Reveals Hyperlipidemia and Signaling Cross-talks with Phosphodiesterases

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 5, 页码 3477-3488

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.419150

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5T32 GM07491]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular complications are common dysregulations of metabolic syndrome. Transplant patients treated with immunosuppressant drugs such as cyclosporine A (CsA), an inhibitor of calcineurin phosphatase, frequently develop similar metabolic complications. Although calcineurin is known to mediate insulin sensitivity by regulating beta-cell growth and adipokine gene transcription, its role in lipid homeostasis is poorly understood. Here, we examined lipid homeostasis in mice lacking calcineurin A beta (CnA beta(-/-)). We show that mice lacking calcineurin A beta are hyperlipidemic and develop age-dependent insulin resistance. Hyperlipidemia found in CnA beta(-/-) mice is, in part, due to increased lipolysis in adipose tissues, a process mediated by beta-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways. CnA beta(-/-) mice also exhibit additional pathophysiological phenotypes caused by the potentiated GPCR signaling pathways. A cell autonomous mechanism with sustained cAMP/PKA activation is found in CnA beta(-/-) mice or upon CsA treatment to inhibit calcineurin. Increased PKA activation and cAMP accumulation in CnA beta(-/-) mice, however, are sensitive to phosphodiesterase inhibitor. Indeed, we show that calcineurin regulates degradation of phosphodiesterase 3B, in addition to phosphodiesterase 4D. These results establish a role for calcineurin in lipid homeostasis. These data also indicate that potentiated cAMP signaling pathway may provide an alternative molecular pathogenesis for the metabolic complications elicited by CsA in transplant patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据