4.6 Article

Sensitivity of Heterozygous α1,6-Fucosyltransferase Knock-out Mice to Cigarette Smoke-induced Emphysema IMPLICATION OF ABERRANT TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR-β SIGNALING AND MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE GENE EXPRESSION

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 287, 期 20, 页码 16699-16708

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.315333

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO)
  2. Global Center of Excellent (GCOE)
  3. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan [20249018, 23591118]
  4. Naito Foundation, Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24790331, 24659111, 20249018, 20117008, 24790593, 23591118] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously demonstrated that a deficiency in core fucosylation caused by the genetic disruption of alpha 1,6-fucosyltransferase (Fut8) leads to lethal abnormalities and the development of emphysematous lesions in the lung by attenuation of TGF-beta 1 receptor signaling. Herein, we investigated the physiological relevance of core fucosylation in the pathogenesis of emphysema using viable heterozygous knock-out mice (Fut8(+/-)) that were exposed to cigarette smoke (CS). The Fut8(+/-) mice exhibited a marked decrease in FUT8 activity, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 activities were elevated in the lung at an early stage of exposure. Emphysema developed after a 3-month CS exposure, accompanied by the recruitment of large numbers of macrophages to the lung. CS exposure substantially and persistently elevated the expression level of Smad7, resulting in a significant reduction of Smad2 phosphorylation (which controls MMP-9 expression) in Fut8(+/-) mice and Fut8-deficient embryonic fibroblast cells. These in vivo and in vitro studies show that impaired core fucosylation enhances the susceptibility to CS and constitutes at least part of the disease process of emphysema, in which TGF-beta-Smad signaling is impaired and the MMP-mediated destruction of lung parenchyma is up-regulated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据