4.6 Article

Size and Conformation Limits to Secretion of Disulfide-bonded Loops in Autotransporter Proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 49, 页码 42283-42291

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.306118

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G022054/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G9818340B, G0700151] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/G022054/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0700151] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autotransporters are a superfamily of virulence factors typified by a channel-forming C terminus that facilitates translocation of the functional N-terminal passenger domain across the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. This final step in the secretion of autotransporters requires a translocation-competent conformation for the passenger domain that differs markedly from the structure of the fully folded secreted protein. The nature of the translocation-competent conformation remains controversial, in particular whether the passenger domain can adopt secondary structural motifs, such as disulfide-bonded segments, while maintaining a secretion-competent state. Here, we used the endogenous and closely spaced cysteine residues of the plasmid-encoded toxin (Pet) from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli to investigate the effect of disulfide bond-induced folding on translocation of an autotransporter passenger domain. We reveal that rigid structural elements within disulfide-bonded segments are resistant to autotransporter-mediated secretion. We define the size limit of disulfide-bonded segments tolerated by the autotransporter system demonstrating that, when present, cysteine pairs are intrinsically closely spaced to prevent congestion of the translocator pore by large disulfide-bonded regions. These latter data strongly support the hairpin mode of autotransporter biogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据