4.6 Article

Substrate Recognition and Specificity of the NisB Protein, the Lantibiotic Dehydratase Involved in Nisin Biosynthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 35, 页码 30552-30560

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.263210

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SCHM 1279/10-1]
  2. Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nisin is a posttranslationally modified antimicrobial peptide containing the cyclic thioether amino acids lanthionine and methyllanthionine. Although much is known about its antimicrobial activity and mode of action, knowledge about the nisin modification process is still rather limited. The dehydratase NisB is believed to be the initial interaction partner in modification. NisB dehydrates specific serine and threonine residues in prenisin, whereas the cyclase NisC catalyzes the (methyl) lanthionine formation. The fully modified prenisin is exported and the leader peptide is cleaved off by the extracellular protease NisP. Light scattering analysis demonstrated that purified NisB is a dimer in solution. Using size exclusion chromatography and surface plasmon resonance, the interaction of NisB and prenisin, including several of its modified derivatives, was studied. Unmodified prenisin binds to NisB with an affinity of 1.05 +/- 0.25 mu M, whereas the dehydrated and the fully modified derivatives bind with respective affinities of 0.31 +/- 0.07 and 10.5 +/- 1.7 mu M. The much lower affinity for the fully modified prenisin was related to a > 20-fold higher off-rate. For all three peptides the stoichiometry of binding was 1:1. Active nisin, which is the equivalent of fully modified prenisin lacking the leader peptide did not bind to NisB, nor did prenisin in which the highly conserved FNLD box within the leader peptide was mutated to AAAA. Taken together our data indicate that the leader peptide is essential for initial recognition and binding of prenisin to NisB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据