4.6 Article

The Transcriptome of a Human Polar Body Accurately Reflects Its Sibling Oocyte

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 47, 页码 40743-40749

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.289868

关键词

-

资金

  1. Brown University provost's office
  2. Center for Reproduction and Infertility at Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island and Sigma-Aldrich
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office of Integrative Activities [1004057] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improved methods are needed to reliably and accurately evaluate oocyte quality prior to fertilization and transfer into the woman of human embryos created through in vitro fertilization (IVF). All oocytes that are retrieved and matured in culture are exposed to sperm with little in the way of evaluating the oocyte quality. Furthermore, embryos created through IVF are currently evaluated for developmental potential by morphology, a criterion lacking in quantitation and accuracy. With the recent successes in oocyte vitrification and storage, clear metrics are needed to determine oocyte quality prior to fertilizing. The first polar body (PB) is extruded from the oocyte before fertilization and can be biopsied without damaging the oocyte. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the PB transcriptome is representative of that of the oocyte. Polar body biopsy was performed on metaphase II (MII) oocytes followed by single-cell transcriptome analysis of the oocyte and its sibling PB. Over 12,700 unique mRNAs and miRNAs from the oocyte samples were compared with the 5,431 mRNAs recovered from the sibling PBs (5,256 shared mRNAs or 97%, including miRNAs). The results show that human PBs reflect the oocyte transcript profile and suggests that mRNA detection and quantification through high-throughput quantitative PCR could result in the first molecular diagnostic for gene expression in MII oocytes. This could allow for both oocyte ranking and embryo preferences in IVF applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据