4.6 Article

P-glycoprotein Retains Drug-stimulated ATPase Activity upon Covalent Linkage of the Two Nucleotide Binding Domains at Their C-terminal Ends

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 12, 页码 10476-10482

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.193151

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA100246, GM058600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P-glycoprotein (Pgp), a member of the ABC transporter family, functions as an ATP hydrolysis-driven efflux pump to rid the cell of toxic organic compounds, including a variety of drugs used in anti-cancer chemotherapy. We have recently obtained EM projection images of lipid-bound Pgp without nucleotide and transport substrate that showed the two halves of the transporter separated by a central cavity (Lee, J. Y., Urbatsch, I. L., Senior, A. E., and Wilkens, S. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 4012540131). Addition of nucleotide and/or substrate lead to a close association of the two halves of the transporter, thereby closing the central cavity (Lee, J. Y., Urbatsch, I. L., Senior, A. E., and Wilkens, S. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5769-5779). Here, we used cysteine-mediated disulfide cross-linking to further delineate the structural rearrangements of the two nucleotide binding domains (NBD1 and NBD2) that take place during catalysis. Cysteines introduced at or near the C-terminal ends of NBD1 and NBD2 allowed for spontaneous disulfide cross-linking under nonreducing conditions. For mutant A627C/S1276C, disulfide formation was with high efficiency and cross-linked Pgp retained 30-68% drug-stimulated ATPase activity compared with reduced or cysteine-less Pgp. Two other cysteine pairs (K615C/S1276C and A627C/K1260C) also formed a disulfide but to a lesser extent, and the cross-linked form of these two mutants had lower drug-stimulated ATPase activity. The data suggest that the C-terminal ends of the two NBDs of Pgp are not required to undergo significant motion with respect to one another during the catalytic cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据