4.6 Article

Structural Switching of Staphylococcus aureus Clp Protease A KEY TO UNDERSTANDING PROTEASE DYNAMICS

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 43, 页码 37590-37601

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.277848

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20972173, 20972174, 90913010, 91029704, 21021063, 21172234]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA01040305]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [09PJ1411600, 10410703900]
  4. Key Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development [2009CB918502]
  5. National Science and Technology Major Project [2009ZX09301-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ATP-dependent Clp protease (ClpP) is an attractive new target for the development of anti-infective agents. The ClpP protease consists of two heptameric rings that enclose a large chamber containing 14 proteolytic active sites. Recent studies indicate that ClpP likely undergoes conformational switching between an extended and degraded active state required for substrate proteolysis and a compacted and catalytically inactive state allowing product release. Here, we present the wild-type ClpP structures in two distinct states from Staphylococcus aureus. One structure is very similar to those solved ClpP structures in the extended states. The other is strikingly different from both the extended and the compacted state as observed in ClpP from other species; the handle domain of this structure kinks to take on a compressed conformation. Structural analysis and molecular dynamic simulations show that the handle domain predominantly controls the way in which degradation products exit the chamber through dynamic conformational switching from the extended state to the compressed state. Given the highly conserved sequences among ClpP from different species, this compressed conformation is unexpected and novel, which is potentially valuable for understanding the enzymatic dynamics and the acting mechanisms of ClpP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据