4.6 Article

Methylsulfonylnitrobenzoates, a New Class of Irreversible Inhibitors of the Interaction of the Thyroid Hormone Receptor and Its Obligate Coactivators That Functionally Antagonizes Thyroid Hormone

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.200436

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK58080]
  2. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  3. National Institutes of Health NHGRI
  4. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)
  5. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NR) superfamily and regulate development, growth, and metabolism. Upon binding thyroid hormone, TR undergoes a conformational change that allows the release of corepressors and the recruitment of coactivators, which in turn regulate target gene transcription. Although a number of TR antagonists have been developed, most are analogs of the endogenous hormone that inhibit ligand binding. In a screen for inhibitors that block the association of TR beta with steroid receptor coactivator 2 (SRC2), we identified a novel methylsulfonylnitrobenzoate (MSNB)-containing series that blocks this interaction at micromolar concentrations. Here we have studied a series of MSNB analogs and characterized their structure activity relationships. MSNB members do not displace thyroid hormone T-3 but instead act by direct displacement of SRC2. MSNB series members are selective for the TR over the androgen, vitamin D, and PPAR gamma NR members, and they antagonize thyroid hormone-activated transcription action in cells. The methylsulfonylnitro group is essential for TR beta antagonism. Side-chain alkylamine substituents showed better inhibitory activity than arylamine substituents. Mass spectrum analysis suggested that MSNB inhibitors bind irreversibly to Cys-298 within the AF-2 cleft of TR beta to disrupt SRC2 association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据