4.6 Article

Overexpression of IL-32α Increases Natural Killer Cell-mediated Killing through Up-regulation of Fas and UL16-binding protein 2 (ULBP2) Expression in Human Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.159756

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korean government (Ministry of Education & Science Technology) [R11-2005-017-05003-0, 10033778]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10033778] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IL-32 was recently identified as a proinflammatory cytokine that is induced by IL-18 in natural killer (NK) cells and is highly correlated with inflammatory disorders. However, the relationship between IL-32 and tumor progression is still unknown. In this study, we investigated whether overexpression of IL-32 affects susceptibility of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells to NK cells. Interestingly, IL-32 alpha-overexpressing CML cell lines, K562, Kcl22, and BV173, showed higher NK cell-mediated killing. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that overexpression of IL-32 alpha induced increased expression of Fas and UL16-binding protein 2 (ULBP2) in CML cells. The direct relationship between overexpression of surface molecules by IL-32 alpha and increased NK cell-mediated killing was confirmed by Fas or ULBP2 siRNA transfection. IL-32 alpha-induced Fas and ULBP2 expression are regulated p38 MAPK. In addition, the transcription factor Ets1 plays a key role in ULBP2 specific expression by IL-32 alpha overexpression in ULBP family members. Taken together, these data show that IL-32 alpha stimulates Fas and ULBP2 expression via activation of p38 MAPK, which increases NK susceptibility of CML cells. Enhanced NK cell susceptibility of CML cells by IL-32 alpha overexpression may improve the efficiency of NK cell-based immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据