4.6 Article

Cancer Susceptibility Polymorphism of p53 at Codon 72 Affects Phosphorylation and Degradation of p53 Protein

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 20, 页码 18251-18260

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.208587

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare Japan
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Innovation
  4. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
  5. Hayashi Memorial Foundation for Female Natural Scientists
  6. Sagawa Foundation for Promoting Cancer Research
  7. Takeda Science Foundation
  8. Kobayashi Foundation for Cancer Research
  9. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23501271, 23300365] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The common polymorphism of p53 at codon 72, either encoding proline or arginine, has drawn attention as a genetic factor associated with clinical outcome or cancer risk for the last 2 decades. We now show that these two polymorphic variants differ in protein structure, especially within the N-terminal region and, as a consequence, differ in post-translational modification at the N terminus. The arginine form (p53-72R) shows significantly enhanced phosphorylation at Ser-6 and Ser-20 compared with the proline form (p53-72P). We also show diminished Mdm2-mediated degradation of p53-72R compared with p53-72P, which is at least partly brought about by higher levels of phosphorylation at Ser-20 in p53-72R. Furthermore, enhanced p21 expression in p53-72R-expressing cells, which is dependent on phosphorylation at Ser-6, was demonstrated. Differential p21 expression between the variants was also observed upon activation of TGF-beta signaling. Collectively, we demonstrate a novel molecular difference and simultaneously suggest a difference in the tumor-suppressing function of the variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据