4.6 Article

Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ Coactivator 1α or 1β Overexpression Inhibits Muscle Protein Degradation, Induction of Ubiquitin Ligases, and Disuse Atrophy

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 25, 页码 19460-19471

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.113092

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AR055255, F32AR054699]
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  3. Copenhagen Graduate School of Health Sciences
  4. A. P. Moeller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science
  5. Knud Hoejgaard Foundation
  6. Lundbeck Foundation
  7. Augustinus Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of the transcriptional coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha), like exercise, increases mitochondrial content and inhibits muscle atrophy. To understand these actions, we tested whether PGC-1 alpha or its close homolog, PGC-1 alpha, influences muscle protein turnover. In myotubes, overexpression of either coactivator increased protein content by decreasing overall protein degradation without altering protein synthesis rates. Elevated PGC-1 alpha or PGC-1 alpha also prevented the acceleration of proteolysis induced by starvation or FoxO transcription factors and prevented the induction of autophagy and atrophy-specific ubiquitin ligases by a constitutively active FoxO3. In mouse muscles, overexpression of PGC-1 alpha (like PGC-1 alpha) inhibited denervation atrophy, ubiquitin ligase induction, and transcription by NF kappa B. However, increasing muscle PGC-1 alpha levels pharmacologically by treatment of mice with 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide 1-beta-D-ribofuranoside failed to block loss of muscle mass or induction of ubiquitin ligases upon denervation atrophy, although it prevented loss of mitochondria. This capacity of PGC-1 alpha and PGC-1 alpha to inhibit FoxO3 and NF kappa B actions and proteolysis helps explain how exercise prevents muscle atrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据