4.6 Article

Studies on the Catalytic Mechanism of a Glutamic Peptidase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 28, 页码 21437-21445

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.122432

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scytalidoglutamic peptidase (SGP) is the prototype of fungal glutamic peptidases that are characteristically pepstatin insensitive. These enzymes have a unique catalytic dyad comprised of Gln(53) and Glu(136) that activate a bound water molecule for nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon atom of the scissile peptide bond. The hydrolysis by SGP at peptide bonds with proline in the P-1' position is a rare event among peptidases that we investigated using the series of fluorescence resonance energy transfer peptides, Abz-KLXPSKQ-EDDnp, compared with the series Abz-KLXSSKQ-EDDnp. The preference observed in these two series for Phe and His over Leu, Ile, Val, Arg, and Lys, seems to be related to the structure of the S-1 subsite of SGP. These results and the pH profiles of SGP activity showed that its S-1 subsite can accommodate the benzyl group of Phe at pH 4 as well as the positively charged imidazolium group of His. In the pH range 2 to 7, SGP maintains its structure and activity, but at pH 8 or higher it is irreversibly denatured. The intrinsic fluorescence of the Trp residues of SGP were sensitive to the titration of carboxyl groups having low pK values; this can be attributed to the buried Asp(57) and/or Asp(43) as described in SGP three-dimensional structure. The solvent kinetic isotope effects and the proton inventory experiments support a mechanism for the glutamic peptidase SGP that involves the nucleophilic attack of the general base (Glu(136)) activated water, and establish a fundamental role of the S-1 subsite interactions in promoting catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据