4.6 Article

Cleavage of the NF-κB Family Protein p65/RelA by the Chlamydial Protease-like Activity Factor (CPAF) Impairs Proinflammatory Signaling in Cells Infected with Chlamydiae

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 53, 页码 41320-41327

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.152280

关键词

-

资金

  1. Else-Kromer-Fresenius-Stiftung
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria that frequently cause human disease. Chlamydiae replicate in a membranous vacuole in the cytoplasm termed inclusion but have the ability to transport proteins into the host cell cytosol. Chlamydial replication is associated with numerous changes of host cell functions, and these changes are often linked to proteolytic events. It has been shown earlier that the member of the NF-kappa B family of inflammation-associated transcription factors, p65/RelA, is cleaved during chlamydial infection, and a chlamydial protease has been implicated. We here provide evidence that the chlamydial protease chlamydial protease-like activity factor (CPAF) is responsible for degradation of p65/RelA during infection. This degradation was seen in human and in mouse cells infected with either Chlamydia trachomatis or Chlamydia pneumoniae where it correlated with the expression of CPAF and CPAF activity. Isolated expression of active C. trachomatis or C. pneumoniae CPAF in human or mouse cells yielded a p65 fragment of indistinguishable size from the one generated during infection. Expression of active CPAF in human cells caused a mild reduction in I kappa B alpha phosphorylation but a strong reduction in NF-kappa B reporter activity in response to interleukin-1 beta. Infection with C. trachomatis likewise reduced this responsiveness. IL-1 beta-dependent secretion of IL-8 was further reduced by CPAF expression. Secretion of CPAF is, thus, a mechanism that reduces host cell sensitivity to a proinflammatory stimulus, which may facilitate bacterial growth in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据