4.6 Article

Topologically Random Insertion of EmrE Supports a Pathway for Evolution of Inverted Repeats in Ion-coupled Transporters

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 20, 页码 15234-15244

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.108746

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS16708]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [119/04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inverted repeats in ion-coupled transporters have evolved independently in many unrelated families. It has been suggested that this inverted symmetry is an essential element of the mechanism that allows for the conformational transitions in transporters. We show here that small multidrug transporters offer a model for the evolution of such repeats. This family includes both homodimers and closely related heterodimers. In the former, the topology determinants, evidently identical in each protomer, are weak, and we show that for EmrE, an homodimer from Escherichia coli, the insertion into the membrane is random, and dimers are functional whether they insert into the cytoplasmic membrane with the N- and C-terminal domains facing the inside or the outside of the cell. Also, mutants designed to insert with biased topology are functional regardless of the topology. In the case of EbrAB, a heterodimer homologue supposed to interact antiparallel, we show that one of the subunits, EbrB, can also function as a homodimer, most likely in a parallel mode. In addition, the EmrE homodimer can be forced to an antiparallel topology by fusion of an additional transmembrane segment. The simplicity of the mechanism of coupling ion and substrate transport and the few requirements for substrate recognition provide the robustness necessary to tolerate such a unique and unprecedented ambiguity in the interaction of the subunits and in the dimer topology relative to the membrane. The results suggest that the small multidrug transporters are at an evolutionary junction and provide a model for the evolution of structure of transport proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据