4.6 Article

The Bcl-2 Homology Domain 3 Mimetic Gossypol Induces Both Beclin 1-dependent and Beclin 1-independent Cytoprotective Autophagy in Cancer Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 33, 页码 25570-25581

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.118125

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAS
  2. INSERM
  3. PHC-PFCC Programme Francais de Cooperation avec la Chine
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology [2007CB914800, 2009CB512800]
  5. NSFC [30771080]
  6. ARC
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 773]
  8. Fondation Franco-Chinoise pour la Science et ses Applications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gossypol, a natural Bcl-2 homology domain 3 mimetic compound isolated from cottonseeds, is currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Here, we provide evidence that gossypol induces autophagy followed by apoptotic cell death in both the MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma and HeLa cell lines. We first show that knockdown of the Bcl-2 homology domain 3-only protein Beclin 1 reduces gossypol-induced autophagy in MCF-7 cells, but not in HeLa cells. Gossypol inhibits the interaction between Beclin 1 and Bcl-2 (B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2), antagonizes the inhibition of autophagy by Bcl-2, and hence stimulates autophagy. We then show that knockdown of Vps34 reduces gossypol-induced autophagy in both cell lines, and consistent with this, the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate-binding protein WIPI-1 is recruited to autophagosomal membranes. Further, Atg5 knockdown also reduces gossypol-mediated autophagy. We conclude that gossypol induces autophagy in both a canonical and a noncanonical manner. Notably, we found that gossypol-mediated apoptotic cell death was potentiated by treatment with the autophagy inhibitor wortmannin or with small interfering RNA against essential autophagy genes (Vps34, Beclin 1, and Atg5). Our findings support the notion that gossypol-induced autophagy is cytoprotective and not part of the cell death process induced by this compound.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据