4.6 Article

Active Site Mutations in Mammalian DNA Polymerase δ Alter Accuracy and Replication Fork Progression

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 42, 页码 32264-32272

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.147017

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA102029, R01 CA115802, P01 CA077852, F30 AG030314, T32 GM007266]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA polymerase delta (pol delta) is one of the two main replicative polymerases in eukaryotes; it synthesizes the lagging DNA strand and also functions in DNA repair. In previous work, we demonstrated that heterozygous expression of the pol delta L604G variant in mice results in normal life span and no apparent phenotype, whereas a different substitution at the same position, L604K, is associated with shortened life span and accelerated carcinogenesis. Here, we report in vitro analysis of the homologous mutations at position Leu-606 in human pol delta. Four-subunit human pol delta variants that harbor or lack 3' -> 5'-exonucleolytic proofreading activity were purified from Escherichia coli. The pol delta L606G and L606K holoenzymes retain catalytic activity and processivity similar to that of wild type pol delta. pol delta L606G is highly error prone, incorporating single noncomplementary nucleotides at a high frequency during DNA synthesis, whereas pol delta L606K is extremely accurate, with a higher fidelity of single nucleotide incorporation by the active site than that of wild type pol delta. However, pol delta L606K is impaired in the bypass of DNA adducts, and the homologous variant in mouse embryonic fibroblasts results in a decreased rate of replication fork progression in vivo. These results indicate that different substitutions at a single active site residue in a eukaryotic polymerase can either increase or decrease the accuracy of synthesis relative to wild type and suggest that enhanced fidelity of base selection by a polymerase active site can result in impaired lesion bypass and delayed replication fork progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据