4.6 Article

The Ecto-enzyme CD38 Is a Nicotinic Acid Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NAADP) Synthase That Couples Receptor Activation to Ca2+ Mobilization from Lysosomes in Pancreatic Acinar Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 49, 页码 38251-38259

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.125864

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC)
  3. Fondation de la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  4. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) is the most potent Ca2+-mobilizing intracellular messenger and is linked to a variety of stimuli and cell surface receptors. However, the enzyme responsible for endogenous NAADP synthesis in vivo is unknown, and it has been proposed that another enzyme differing from ADP-ribosyl cyclase family members may exist. The ectoenzyme CD38, involved in many functions as diverse as cell proliferation and social behavior, represents an important alternative. In pancreatic acinar cells, the hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) stimulates NAADP production evoking Ca2+ signals by discharging acidic Ca2+ stores and leading to digestive enzyme secretion. From cells derived from CD38(-/-) mice, we provide the first physiological evidence that CD38 is required for endogenous NAADP generation in response to CCK stimulation. Furthermore, CD38 expression in CD38-deficient pancreatic AR42J cells remodels Ca2+-signaling pathways in these cells by restoring Ca2+ mobilization from lysosomes during CCK-induced Ca2+ signaling. In agreement with an intracellular site for messenger synthesis, we found that CD38 is expressed in endosomes. These CD38-containing vesicles, likely of endosomal origin, appear to be proximal to lysosomes but not colocalized with them. We propose that CD38 is an NAADP synthase required for coupling receptor activation to NAADP-mediated Ca2+ release from lysosomal stores in pancreatic acinar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据