4.6 Article

Estrogen Receptor β Binds to and Regulates Three Distinct Classes of Target Genes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 29, 页码 22059-22066

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.114116

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Cancer Society
  2. Bionovo, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) has potent antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting that ER beta-selective agonists might be a new class of therapeutic and chemopreventative agents. To understand how ER beta regulates genes, we identified genes regulated by the unliganded and liganded forms of ER alpha and ER beta in U2OS cells. Microarray data demonstrated that virtually no gene regulation occurred with unliganded ER alpha, whereas many genes were regulated by estradiol (E-2). These results demonstrated that ER alpha requires a ligand to regulate a single class of genes. In contrast, ER beta regulated three classes of genes. Class I genes were regulated primarily by unliganded ER beta. Class II genes were regulated only with E-2, whereas class III genes were regulated by both unliganded ER beta and E-2. There were 453 class I genes, 258 class II genes, and 83 class III genes. To explore the mechanism whereby ER beta regulates different classes of genes, chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing was performed to identify ER beta binding sites and adjacent transcription factor motifs in regulated genes. AP1 binding sites were more enriched in class I genes, whereas ERE, NF kappa B1, and SP1 sites were more enriched in class II genes. ER beta bound to all three classes of genes, demonstrating that ER beta binding is not responsible for differential regulation of genes by unliganded and liganded ER beta. The coactivator NCOA2 was differentially recruited to several target genes. Our findings indicate that the unliganded and liganded forms of ER beta regulate three classes of genes by interacting with different transcription factors and coactivators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据