4.6 Article

Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 (Bortezomib) Induces Calpain-dependent IκBα Degradation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 21, 页码 16096-16104

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.072694

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA128613]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-04-1-0142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proteasome, a key component of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, has emerged as an important cancer therapeutic target. PS-341 (also called Bortezomib or Velcade) is the first proteasome inhibitor approved for newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma and is currently being tested in many clinical trials against other types of cancers. One proposed mechanism by which PS-341 exerts its anticancer effect is inactivation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) through prevention of I kappa B alpha degradation. In this study, we show that PS-341 at concentrations that effectively inhibited the growth of human cancer cells, instead of increasing I kappa B alpha stability, paradoxically induced I kappa B alpha degradation. As a result, PS-341 facilitated p65 nuclear translocation and increased NF-kappa B activity. Moreover, I kappa B alpha degradation by PS-341 occurred early before induction of apoptosis and could not be inhibited by a pan-caspase inhibitor or caspase-8 silencing; however, it could be prevented with calpain inhibitors, calcium-chelating agents, calpain knockdown, or calpastatin overexpression. In agreement, PS-341 increased calpain activity. These data together indicate that PS-341 induces a calpain-mediated I kappa B alpha degradation independent of caspases. In the presence of a calpain inhibitor, the apoptosis-inducing activity of PS-341 was dramatically enhanced. Collectively, these unexpected findings suggest not only a novel paradigm regarding the relationship between proteasome inhibition and NF-kappa B activity but also a strategy to enhance the anticancer efficacy of PS-341.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据