4.2 Article

Biogeography of freshwater fishes from the Northeastern Mata Atlantica freshwater ecoregion: distribution, endemism, and area relationships

期刊

NEOTROPICAL ICHTHYOLOGY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 683-698

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA ICTIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20130228

关键词

Coastal drainages; Eastern Brazil; Neotropical region; PAE; River relationships

类别

资金

  1. CNPq [309840/2003-1, 476449/2007-3, 476495/2010-5]
  2. All Catfish Species Inventory (NSF) [DEB-0315963]
  3. South American Characiformes Inventory (FAPESP) [2011/50282-7]
  4. CAPES
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/50282-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Northeastern Mata Atllantica freshwater ecoregion (NMAF) includes part of the eastern Brazilian coastal drainages, has high level of fish endemism and great biogeographic significance. A taxonomic inventory of freshwater fishes from 25 drainages of the NMAF ecoregion and a biogeographic analysis using the Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity (PAE) method were carried out. A total of 192 native species was listed. The PAE method was applied to 24 basins and 37 species, resulting in five equally parsimonious area diagrams. The strict consensus diagram indicates the existence of two main groups of basins throughout the NMAF ecoregion. These groups were denominated: North Group and Central-South Group. The Central-South Group shows a basal polytomy composed by two Groups (Central Group and South Group) plus the rio Itapemirim basin. The North Group is composed by eight drainages from the rio Sergipe to the rio Paraguacu, the Central Group by five drainages from the rio Cachoeira to the rio Jequitinhonha, and the South Group by nine drainages from the rio Buranhem to the rio Doce. Comments about the species distribution and the fish fauna shared with adjacent ecoregions are provided. We also present a comparison of the hypothesis of river relationships proposed herein with published phylogenetic hypotheses that include taxa relevant to this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据