4.6 Article

Two Golgi-resident 3′-Phosphoadenosine 5′-Phosphosulfate Transporters Play Distinct Roles in Heparan Sulfate Modifications and Embryonic and Larval Development in Caenorhabditis elegans

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 32, 页码 24717-24728

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.088229

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan [B-21390025, B-20370051]
  3. Japan Science and Technology Corp.
  4. National Institutes of Health, NCRR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthesis of extracellular sulfated molecules requires active 3 '-phosphoadenosine 5 '-phosphosulfate (PAPS). For sulfation to occur, PAPS must pass through the Golgi membrane, which is facilitated by Golgi-resident PAPS transporters. Caenorhabditis elegans PAPS transporters are encoded by two genes, pst-1 and pst-2. Using the yeast heterologous expression system, we characterized PST-1 and PST-2 as PAPS transporters. We created deletion mutants to study the importance of PAPS transporter activity. The pst-1 deletion mutant exhibited defects in cuticle formation, post-embryonic seam cell development, vulval morphogenesis, cell migration, and embryogenesis. The pst-2 mutant exhibited a wildtype phenotype. The defects observed in the pst-1 mutant could be rescued by transgenic expression of pst-1 and hPAPST1 but not pst-2 or hPAPST2. Moreover, the phenotype of a pst-1; pst-2 double mutant were similar to those of the pst-1 single mutant, except that larval cuticle formation was more severely defected. Disaccharide analysis revealed that heparan sulfate from these mutants was undersulfated. Gene expression reporter analysis revealed that these PAPS transporters exhibited different tissue distributions and subcellular localizations. These data suggest that pst-1 and pst-2 play different physiological roles in heparan sulfate modification and development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据